Immediate complications after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a prospective study

Immediate complications after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a prospective study

Sergio G. García-Quiterio 1 , Jorge Ayón-Aguilar 2 , Israel Aguilar-Cózatl 3

1 Emergency Service, Hospital General de Zona No. 20 “La Margarita”, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico; 2 Medical Research Assistant Coordination, Delegación Puebla, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico; 3 Clinical Coordination of Health Education and Research, Hospital General de Zona No. 20 “La Margarita”. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico

*Correspondence: Sergio G. García-Quiterio. Email: sergioggq_4@hotmail.com

Fecha de recepción: 26-11-2025
Fecha de aceptación: 22-01-2026
DOI: 10.24875/AMH.25000040
Disponible en internet: 24-07-2026
An Med ABC. 2026;71(3):173-178

Abstract

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of death worldwide; fibrinolytic therapy is a fundamental part of its treatment, which is why identifying its possible immediate complications has become extremely important. Objective: Determine the immediate complications following fibrinolytic treatment for acute myocardial infarction. Material and methods: Descriptive, longitudinal, prospective study in a second-level IMSS hospital in Puebla. Sixty patients over 18 years of age with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction who received fibrinolytic therapy were included. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, and a correlation was performed using Spearman’s Rho. Results: 65% of the population was male, with a mean age of 66 years; the predominant associated comorbidity was systemic arterial hypertension. The most frequent complication was arrhythmias in 58.8%, and the correlation between sex and the presence of complications obtained a p = 0.017. Conclusions: ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction is more common in men between the ages of 50 and 60. Complications associated with fibrinolytic therapy are frequent, so identifying this condition is essential when treating this pathology.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome. ST elevation myocardial infarction. Fibrinolysis.

Contents

Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases have increased their relevance in recent decades and have become one of the main causes of mortality worldwide, also generating a significant economic impact on public and private health systems. Within this group, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) represents the most frequent entity and of greatest clinical relevance1,2.

AMI is defined as evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical context compatible with acute myocardial ischemia, identified by an increase in cardiac biomarkers, particularly troponins, above the 99th percentile, associated with characteristic electrocardiographic findings such as ST-segment elevation or depression, left bundle branch block, and the appearance of pathological Q waves; findings in imaging studies with myocardial loss or wall motion abnormality and identification of coronary thrombus through angiography and/or autopsy are also very useful3.

Globally, AMI has a higher prevalence in people over 60 years of age, with an approximate incidence of 9.5%, with males being the most affected with a mean age of presentation of 65 years4,5. In Mexico, this pathology constitutes the first cause of mortality in men over 45 years of age, with a mean age of presentation of 63.3 years6,7.

From a pathophysiological point of view, AMI originates mainly from the rupture of an atheromatous plaque in the coronary arteries, which triggers a local inflammatory response mediated by macrophages and monocytes, favoring platelet activation and thrombus formation. This process leads to partial or total obstruction of coronary blood flow, generating myocardial ischemia and, if the occlusion persists, irreversible necrosis of the affected tissue8,9. The sudden interruption of blood flow causes structural and functional injury to myocardial cells, culminating in ischemic necrosis due to lack of oxygen and essential nutrients10,11. Less common mechanisms include coronary vasospasm, congenital or acquired anatomical abnormalities, spontaneous coronary dissection, and coronary embolisms12,13.

Risk factors associated with AMI are classified as modifiable and non-modifiable. In young patients (< 45 years), the main non-modifiable factors include male sex, systemic arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hereditary family history of myocardial infarction. Among modifiable factors, smoking, obesity, dyslipidemia, and drug use stand out14,15. In elderly patients, the predominant sex continues to be male; however, the female sex is related to greater hemodynamic involvement and the appearance of complications, and after menopause the incidence equals that of the male sex16,17.

The diagnosis is made through typical clinical manifestations (precordial pain, of retrosternal location, with increased intensity, oppressive, burning, which may radiate and does not subside with rest) or atypical (in special groups such as diabetic patients or elderly adults)18,19, electrocardiogram (elevation or non-elevation of the ST segment in 2 contiguous leads and amplitude according to sex, new appearance of left or right bundle branch block), and elevated troponins (above the 99th percentile)20,21.

The treatment of choice for this pathology is early reperfusion, which is a fundamental strategy to reduce associated morbidity and mortality. This can be performed through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or fibrinolytic therapy (alteplase or tenecteplase)22,23.

Regarding fibrinolytic therapy, post-thrombolysis complications have been documented immediately (< 6 hours) or in a delayed manner (6-24 hours); among the most frequent are hemorrhage, cardiogenic shock, acute pulmonary edema, atrial fibrillation, angina, hypotension, nausea, vomiting, and allergic reactions24,25.

The objective of the present study was to determine the immediate complications following fibrinolytic treatment for AMI.

Material and methods

An observational, descriptive, impact, longitudinal, unicentric, homodemic, and prospective study was conducted in a second-level hospital of the Mexican Social Security Institute in Puebla, Mexico, during the period from January to June 2024. Patients over 18 years of age with a diagnosis of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction, established through clinical, laboratory (troponin determination), and electrocardiographic criteria, who came to the emergency department within a therapeutic window of less than 12 hours from symptom onset and who were treated with tenecteplase, were included. Those with non-ST-segment elevation AMI and those with absolute and relative contraindications for thrombolysis were excluded. Patients who requested to leave the study for any reason were eliminated.

The variables analyzed included sociodemographic data (age, sex, and occupation), cardiovascular and metabolic comorbidities, clinical characteristics, and the presence of immediate complications following fibrinolytic therapy, defined as those that occurred within the first 6 hours after tenecteplase administration; these include the presence of arrhythmias, hypotension, reperfusion failure, cardiogenic shock, acute pulmonary edema, or hemorrhagic events.

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS v25.0). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the frequencies and percentages of the evaluated population, using measures of central tendency and dispersion. The normality of quantitative variables was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The correlation between sex and the presentation of complications was analyzed using Spearman’s Rho test, considering p < 0.05 as statistically significant.

Results

A total of 60 patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited; there was a predominance of males, with 39 (65.0%) patients, while 21 (35.0%) were female; the mean age was 66 years (SD + 13), with a minimum of 35 and a maximum of 88 years.

Regarding occupation, the most frequent was retired in 29 (48.3%) patients, while the least frequent was housewife in 2 (3.3%). The remaining results are shown in table 1.

Table 1. Occupation

Activity (n = 60) %
Retired 29 48.3
Employed 25 41.7
Housewife 2 3.3
Unemployed 4 6.7

Regarding comorbidities, systemic arterial hypertension was the most frequent, occurring in 57 (95%) patients, followed by type 2 diabetes in 39 (65%), obesity in 30 (50%), and sedentary lifestyle in 26 (43.3%); the least frequent comorbidities were chronic kidney disease in 5 (8.3%) patients and previous ischemic heart disease together with family history of acute myocardial infarction in 12 (20%) patients each. Details are shown in table 2.

Table 2. Comorbidities

Disease or condition Yes No
(n = 60) % (n = 60) %
Smoking 15 25.0 45 75.0
Sedentary lifestyle 26 43.3 34 56.7
Obesity 30 50.0 30 50.0
Systemic arterial hypertension 57 95.0 3 5.0
Type 2 diabetes 39 65.0 21 35.0
Previous ischemic heart disease 12 20.0 48 80.0
Dyslipidemia 18 30.0 42 70.0
Chronic kidney disease 5 8.3 55 91.7
Family history of AMI 12 20.0 48 80.0

AMI: acute myocardial infarction.

Regarding the clinical manifestations associated with acute myocardial infarction in our population, the predominant symptom was retrosternal pain, reported in 55 (91.7%) patients, while 5 (8.3%) presented epigastric pain. Pain radiation to the jaw was observed in 31 (51.7%) patients; 39 (65%) patients presented pain in the left arm, 36 (60%) had dyspnea, 47 (78.3%) had diaphoresis, and 19 (31.7%) reported vertigo (Table 3).

Table 3. Clinical characteristics

Variables Yes No
(n = 60) % (n = 60) %
Thoracic pain 55 91.7 5 8.3
Epigastric pain 5 8.3 55 91.7
Pain radiating to jaw 31 51.7 29 48.3
Left arm pain 39 65.0 21 35.0
Dyspnea 36 60.0 24 40.0
Diaphoresis 47 78.3 13 21.7
Vertigo 19 31.7 41 68.3

All patients were treated with tenecteplase, and a total of 17 (28.3%) patients presented immediate complications, of which the most frequent were arrhythmias in 10 (58.8%) patients, followed by hypotension (23.5%) and reperfusion failure (17.6%); it is important to mention that none of the patients presented hemorrhage as a complication. The distribution of complications is shown in table 4.

Table 4. Complications

Distribution of complications n %
Presentation of complications (n = 60)
 Yes
 No

17
43

28.3
71.7
Type of complications (n = 17)
 Hemorrhage
 Arrhythmias
 Hypotension
 Reperfusion failure
 Allergy
 Mechanical

0
10
4
3
0
0

0.0
58.8
23.5
17.6
0.0
0.0

When analyzing the relationship between sex and the presence of immediate complications, it was observed that 38.5% of male patients presented some type of complication, compared to 9.5% of the female sex. Analysis using Spearman’s Rho correlation test showed a coefficient of 0.336, with a p = 0.017. The remaining results are shown in table 5.

Table 5. Complications in relation to sex

Complications Male (n = 39) Female (n = 21) Spearman’s Rho (p)
n % n %
Yes 15 38.5 2 9.5 0.017
No 24 61.5 19 90.5

Discussion

In this study, 60 patients with ST-segment elevation AMI who were treated with thrombolytic therapy were included; a clear predominance of the male sex was observed at 65%, which is consistent with that reported by Martínez et al. and Pérez et al.,26,27 who obtained a predominance of the male sex at 75% and 73.2%, respectively. This marked predominance in the male sex is explained by a combination of biological mechanisms (lower estrogen levels), the presence of risk factors (they tend to exhibit it in a higher proportion compared to women) and behavioral factors28,29.

The mean age of presentation reported in national and international literature varies from approximately 62-64 years26,27, similar to what was found in our study, with a mean age of 66 years.

AMI is associated with cardiovascular risk factors such as dyslipidemia, systemic arterial hypertension, metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, and obesity². In this study, it was found that the predominant comorbidity was systemic arterial hypertension at 95%, followed by type 2 diabetes at 65% and obesity at 50%, which is consistent with that reported by Sánchez et al., in which arterial hypertension predominated at 30%, followed by a history of cardiovascular disease at 24% and diabetes mellitus at 23%30. However, Mora et al.31 reported that the most frequent cardiovascular factor was smoking at 68.4%, followed by sedentary lifestyle at 59.6% and, in third place, systemic arterial hypertension at 56.1%.

Regarding clinical presentation, Castro et al.,19 in their study conducted in Cuba, found that the majority of their study population presented retrosternal pain in 81.3%, with a sensation of oppression in 76% and with radiation to the left shoulder and arm in 92%; which is consistent with what was obtained in this work with a predominance of retrosternal pain in 91.7%, with radiation to the jaw in 65% and to the left arm in 60%.

Of our study population, 28.3% presented complications following fibrinolytic treatment with tenecteplase, the most frequent being arrhythmias at 58.8%, followed by hypotension at 23.5% and reperfusion failure at 17.6%; it is worth mentioning that none of our patients presented hemorrhage. The absence of hemorrhagic events in our population is relevant, since in contrast to what is reported in other studies such as that of Rego et al., in which 18% presented complications, the most frequent being hypotension at 19.34%, followed by nausea at 5.27%32; and that of Mora et al.,31 who reported in their population 10.5% with complications associated with fibrinolysis, and of these, hemorrhage predominated in 100% of patients. This finding can be explained by adequate patient selection, adherence to established contraindications, and the use of tenecteplase, which has demonstrated a favorable safety profile compared to other fibrinolytic agents.

Regarding the relationship between sex and the presence of complications, 38.5% of the male patients in our study presented complications compared to only 9.5% of female patients, with a p = 0.017, which is statistically significant. This result has been reported variably in the literature; some studies suggest a higher incidence of complications in men, while others describe greater severity and worse prognosis in women. These differences could be related to hormonal factors, different risk profiles, or variations in response to treatment, which underscores the need for additional research to clarify the impact of sex on early evolution following fibrinolysis.

The main limitations of the study include its observational design, the relatively small sample size, and the follow-up period restricted to the first hours following fibrinolytic treatment. This study is among the few conducted in our country on this subject and contributes significantly to information on thrombolytic treatment and its associated complications. However, it is a starting point for future research with the areas of opportunity already mentioned for better comparison of results.

Conclusion

In this study, it was observed that ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction was more frequent in males, with an average age in the sixth decade of life. The predominant comorbidities were systemic arterial hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and obesity.

Approximately one-third of patients presented immediate complications following fibrinolytic therapy with tenecteplase, with arrhythmias being the most frequent complication, followed by hypotension and reperfusion failure. No hemorrhagic events were documented during the observation period.

Funding

The authors declare they have received no funding for this study.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical considerations

Protection of human subjects and animals. The authors declare that no experiments on humans or animals were performed for this research.

Confidentiality, informed consent, and ethical approval. The authors have followed their institution’s confidentiality protocols. This study was approved by the Local Health Research Committee No. 2108 of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, with registration number R-2024-2108-003. Informed consent was obtained from the patients, and approval from the Ethics Committee is available. Information was handled with strict confidentiality criteria between the physician and the participant and was used exclusively for research purposes. SAGER guidelines have been followed as applicable to the nature of the study.

Declaration on the use of artificial intelligence. The authors declare that no generative artificial intelligence was used in the writing or creation of the content of this manuscript.

References

1. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Enfermedades cardiovasculares. OMS; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)

2. Vázquez F. Infarto agudo de miocardio: artículo de revisión. Arch Med (UAT). 2022;1:22-30.

3. Silva DR, Salazar JC, Correa J, Villagómez JS. Importancia de las troponinas en el diagnóstico de infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM). RECIAMUC. 2019;3:22-40.

4. Salari N, Morddarvanjoghi F, Abdolmaleki A, Rasoulpoor S, Khaleghi AA, Hezarkhani LA, et al. The global prevalence of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023;23:206.

5. Gaviria S, Ramírez A, Alzate M, Contreras H, Jaramillo N, Muñoz MC. Epidemiología del síndrome coronario agudo. Med UPB. 2020;39: 49-56.

6. Secretaría de Salud (MX). Diagnóstico y tratamiento del infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST: guía de práctica clínica, evidencias y recomendaciones. México: CENETEC; 2021. Available from: http://www.cenetec-difusion.com/CMGPC/GPC-IMSS-357-21/ER.pdf

7. Borrayo G, Rosas M, Ramírez E, Saturno G, Estrada J, Parra R, et al. STEMI and NSTEMI: real-world study in Mexico (RENASCA). Arch Med Res. 2018;49:609-19.

8. Mechanic OJ, Gavin M, Grossman SA. Acute Myocardial Infarction. En: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459269/.

9. Ojha N, Dhamoon AS. Myocardial Infarction. En: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537076/.

10. Kingma J. Acute myocardial infarction: perspectives on physiopathology of myocardial injury and protective interventions. En: Cardiac diseases: novel aspects of cardiac risk, cardiorenal pathology and cardiac interventions. London: IntechOpen; 2021.

11. Vautrin E, Jean ABP, Fourny M, Marlière S, Vanzetto G, Bouvaist H, et al. Sex differences in coronary artery lesions and in-hospital outcomes for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction under the age of 45. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96:1222-30.

12. Deshmukh PP, Singh MM, Deshpande MA, Rajput AS. Clinical and angiographic profile of very young adults presenting with first acute myocardial infarction: data from a tertiary care center in Central India. Indian Heart J. 2019;71:418-21.

13. Waterbury TM, Tarantini G, Vogel B, Mehran R, Gersh BJ, Gulati R. Non- atherosclerotic causes of acute coronary syndromes. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17:229-41.

14. Ruiz V, Palacios J, Cruz A, García D, Pérez MJ, Fernández A, et al. ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients ≤ 35 years of age. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123:889-93.

15. Dattoli CA, Jackson CN, Gallardo AL, Gopar R, Araiza D, Arias A. Infarto agudo de miocardio: revisión sobre factores de riesgo, etiología, hallazgos angiográficos y desenlaces en pacientes jóvenes. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2021;91:485-92.

16. Toledo SO, Suárez B, Borges RS, Rosell A, Cardosa D, Núñez DL. Factores de riesgo asociados al infarto agudo de miocardio. Revista 16 de Abril. 2023;62:e1763.

17. Enamorado A, Goro G, García I, González M. Caracterización clínica y epidemiológica de pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST. Rev Panor Cuba Salud. 2020;15:6.

18. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, Barbato E, Berry C, Chieffo A, et al. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:3720-826.

19. Castro ME, Paumier E, Abad PL, Torres R, Navarro V. Caracterización de pacientes con infarto agudo del miocardio con elevación del segmento ST, Baracoa, Guantánamo, 2017-2019. Rev Inf Cient. 2020;99: 310-20.

20. Sebastián CG, Sequeiros MA, Ruiz JMM, Gómez JLZ. Infarto agudo de miocardio. SCACEST. Medicine. 2021;13:2177-84.

21. Borrayo G, Alcocer MA, Araiza D, Arias A, Aubanel P, Cortés J, et al. Guía práctica interinstitucional para el tratamiento del infarto agudo de miocardio. Gac Med Mex. 2020;156:559-69.

22. Borrayo G, Alcocer MA, Araiza D, Arias A, Aubanel P, Cortés J, et al. Guía práctica interinstitucional para el tratamiento del infarto agudo de miocardio. Gac Med Mex. 2020;156:589-601.

23. Custodio P, Miranda D, López LM, Paredes CP, Yábar WG, Rojas-De La Cuba P, et al. Propuesta de manejo inicial del infarto de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST no complicado en centros sin capacidad de intervención coronaria percutánea en el Perú. Arch Peru Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2023;4:164-83.

24. Arredondo AE, Domínguez Y, Reyes RM, Fumero L. Complicaciones del infarto agudo del miocardio tratado con trombolisis. Rev Medica Electron. 2019;41:357-67.

25. Satish S. Study of arrhythmias during and within six hours of thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Dis Diagn. 2020;8:399.

26. Martínez A, Sainz BA, Ramos B, Pacheco E, Zorio B, Castañeda G. Infarto agudo del miocardio con elevación del ST en el servicio de urgencias del Instituto de Cardiología. Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2017;23:24-31.

27. Pérez T, García AJ. Uso de la estreptoquinasa en el tratamiento trombolítico del infarto agudo de miocardio. Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2020;26:e1185.

28. SenthilKumar G, Katunaric B, Bordas H, Sarvaideo J, Freed JK. Estrogen and the vascular endothelium: the unanswered questions. Endocrinology. 2023;164:bqad078.

29. Anand SS, Islam S, Rosengren A, Franzosi MG, Steyn K, Yusufali AH, et al. Risk factors for myocardial infarction in women and men: insights from the INTERHEART study. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:932-40.

30. Sánchez JA, Sánchez NE, Pavón Y, Castro Z. Infarto agudo de miocardio y factores de riesgo predisponentes. Finlay. 2023;13: 394-403.

31. Mora L, Gutiérrez GI, Gudiño DA, Rodríguez SC. Características clínicas de pacientes con infarto agudo de miocardio tratados con trombólisis en urgencias. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2020;58:100-7.

32. Rego H, Vitón AA, Germán L, Linares LP, Lazo LA. Terapia trombolítica en pacientes con infarto agudo del miocardio. Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2020;26:e1032.